Fundamentalists are sometimes horrified when the Virgin Mary
is referred to as the Mother of God. However, their reaction often rests upon a
misapprehension of not only what this particular title of Mary signifies but
also who Jesus was, and what their own theological forebears, the Protestant
Reformers, had to say regarding this doctrine.
A woman is a man’s mother either if she carried him in her
womb or if she was the woman contributing half of his genetic matter or both.
Mary was the mother of Jesus in both of these senses; because she not only
carried Jesus in her womb but also supplied all of the genetic matter for his
human body, since it was through her—not Joseph—that Jesus "was descended
from David according to the flesh" (Rom. 1:3).
Since Mary is Jesus’ mother, it must be concluded that she
is also the Mother of God: If Mary is the mother of Jesus, and if Jesus is God,
then Mary is the Mother of God. There is no way out of this logical syllogism,
the valid form of which has been recognized by classical logicians since before
the time of Christ.
Although Mary is the Mother of God, she is not his mother in
the sense that she is older than God or the source of her Son’s divinity, for
she is neither. Rather, we say that she is the Mother of God in the sense that
she carried in her womb a divine person—Jesus Christ, God "in the
flesh" (2 John 7, cf. John 1:14)—and in the sense that she contributed the
genetic matter to the human form God took in Jesus Christ.
To avoid this conclusion, Fundamentalists often assert that
Mary did not carry God in her womb, but only carried Christ’s human
nature. This assertion reinvents a heresy from the fifth century known as
Nestorianism, which runs aground on the fact that a mother does not merely
carry the human nature of her child in her womb. Rather, she carries the
person of her child. Women do not give birth to human natures; they give
birth to persons. Mary thus carried and gave birth to the person
of Jesus Christ, and the person she gave birth to was God.
The Nestorian claim that Mary did not give birth to the
unified person of Jesus Christ attempts to separate Christ’s human
nature from his divine nature, creating two separate and distinctpersons—one
divine and one human—united in a loose affiliation. It is therefore a
Christological heresy, which even the Protestant Reformers recognized. Both
Martin Luther and John Calvin insisted on Mary’s divine maternity. In fact, it
even appears that Nestorius himself may not have believed the heresy named
after him. Further, the "Nestorian" church has now signed a joint
declaration on Christology with the Catholic Church and recognizes Mary’s
divine maternity, just as other Christians do.
Since denying that Mary is God’s mother implies doubt about
Jesus’ divinity, it is clear why Christians (until recent times) have been
unanimous in proclaiming Mary as Mother of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment