Truly
the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ
Individuals can make
mistakes or misunderstand their teachers BUT the fact that we find a continuous
and unbroken chain of Christians believing in the real presence of our Lord in
the Eucharist is not only extremely strong evidence that this belief was in existence
from the very first moments of Christian history but that it was taught by the
Apostles themselves.
I mean, a follower of
Jesus could reject what He taught but the others who were taught directly by
Jesus would not all teach the same error.
Let’s go back through
time to find what Christians believed on the Real Presence.
In our Catechism, the
official teaching of the Church on the Eucharist, we find the catechism quoting the council of Trent from 1551 which means that the belief in the
real presence to have been existence for at least from 1551 to today:
Paragraph 1376 of the
Catechism of the Catholic Church:
The Council of Trent summarizes the Catholic faith by declaring:
"Because Christ our Redeemer
said that it was truly his body that he was
offering under the species of bread, it has always been the conviction of the
Church of God, and this holy Council
now declares again , that by the
consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole
substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of
the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change
the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called
transubstantiation."
The Reformation brought
on the need for the Council of Trent because many started teaching contrary to
the Church on many matters including the Real Presence. But what about before
that time?
431 AD
Council of Ephesus
"We will necessarily add this also. Proclaiming the death,
according to the flesh, of the only-begotten Son of God, that is Jesus Christ,
confessing his resurrection from the dead, and his ascension into heaven, we
offer the unbloody sacrifice in the churches, and so go on to the mystical thanksgivings,
and are sanctified, having received his holy flesh and the precious blood of
Christ the Savior of us all. And not as
common flesh do we receive it; God forbid: nor as of a man sanctified and
associated with the Word according to the unity of worth, or as having a divine
indwelling, but as truly the
life-giving and very flesh of the Word himself. For he is the life according to his nature as God, and when he became
united to his flesh, he made it also to be life-giving" (Session 1, Letter of Cyril to
Nestorius)
c.400 AD
"[Christ] took the bread and the cup, each in a similar fashion,
and said: 'This is My Body and this is My Blood.' Not a figure of His body nor
a figure of His blood, as some persons of petrified mind are wont to
rhapsodize, but in truth the Body and the Blood of Christ." (Marcus the Magnesian)
c. 370 AD
"You ought to know what you have received, what you are going to
receive, and what you ought to receive daily. That Bread which you see on the
altar, having been sanctified by the word of God, is the Body of Christ. The
chalice, or rather, what is in that chalice, having been sanctified by the word
of God, is the Blood of
Christ. " (St Augustine)
325 AD
Council of Nicaea I
"It has come to the knowledge of the holy and great synod that,
in some districts and cities, the deacons administer the Eucharist to the
presbyters [i.e., priests], whereas neither canon nor custom permits that they
who have no right to offer [the Eucharistic sacrifice] should give the Body
of Christ to them that do offer [it] " (Canon 18).
212 AD
The flesh is anointed, so that the soul may be dedicated to holiness.
The flesh is signed, so that the soul too may be fortified. The flesh is shaded
by the imposition of hands, so that the soul too may be illuminated by the
Spirit. The flesh feeds on
the Body and Blood of Christ, so that the soul too may fatten on God. (Tertullian)
c.180 AD
“He has declared the cup, a part of creation, to be His own Blood,
from which He causes our blood to flow; and the bread, a part of creation, He
has established as His own Body, from which He gives increase to our bodies. When, therefore, the mixed cup and the baked bread receives the
Word of God and becomes the Eucharist, the Body of Christ , and from these the substance of our body is increased and supported,
how can they say that the flesh is not capable of receiving the gift of God,
which is eternal life.” (Ireaneus of Lyons)
c. 150 AD
“For not as common bread nor common drink do we receive these; but
since Jesus Christ our Savior was made incarnate by the word of God and had
both flesh and blood for our salvation, so too, as we have been taught, the
food which has been made into the Eucharist by the Eucharistic prayer set down
by Him, and by the change of which our blood and flesh is nourished, is both the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus.” (St Justin Martyr)
c.110
“I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this
life. I desire the Bread
of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, who was
of the seed of David; and for drink I desire
His blood, which is love incorruptible.” (Ignatius of Antioch)
Or
“They [the Gnostics] abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer,
because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus
Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in his
goodness, raised up again.” (Ignatius of Antioch)
Now consider this,
Ignatius learned from the Apostles themselves. Did he misunderstand them? Isn’t
it much more likely that he remembered what he was taught and taught others who
would succeed him as Justin Martyr did, and Irenaeus, Augustine even councils
speaking for the whole church teaching as the first followers of the original
Apostles taught and all speaking with one voice on the matter? The fact of the
matter is the belief of the presence of the Body and Blood of being truly
present in the Eucharist is a belief found throughout the two millennia of
Christian history and without break. The
idea of a symbolic presence only in the Eucharist is a novelty, a tradition of
man.
God Bless
Nathan
No comments:
Post a Comment